I am very sorry about how people are feeling. I feel terrible as a TA, for various reasons, and I can only emphasize with you. On the other hand, I commend you all for sharing your thoughts and feelings-keep them coming! It's very informative, and it's good for people to see that they "are not alone".
Now, here is the tricky part: do you really want to do something tangible about it? I can point out what I don't like about the exam, but this is very unlikely to have any effect, if past experience is a reference. Each one of you can go complain bitterly about how "unfair" it was, which also is not very likely to have any consequences.
Or, we can look at is as scientists, make a coordinate effort, base all arguments on facts, and come up with an objective conclusion and possibly a 'suggestion for improvement' or 'possible solution'. That is much more likely to have an effect.
I don't think anyone will be able to look at this situation objectively enough for the next day or so, as it was a very upsetting experience. When you feel a bit better, you can think about, and maybe quickly write down the reasons why you think that question 1, or 2, or 3 were "bad", and what you would do to make them better. You can also think about how much information, and how much practice did you have on the lac operon? How much about homologous recombination in bacteria? How much about ligations and restriction mapping?
I'll be at Monday's tutorial 15-20 min in advance and I'll stay later, so we'll have time to discuss the matter and decide what to do about it.
Cheers,
Pam
PS: for the record, I think that question 2 was an old question from Dr Beatty (the formatting looks exactly like his, and not at all like Craig's)